香港新浪網MySinaBlog 精選話題工具
« 上一篇 | 下一篇 »
chaser | 7th May 2007 | 精神糧食 | (245 Reads)

Picture

Jean-François Millet, Evening Prayer / The Angelus, 1857-1859. Musée d'Orsay, Paris.

After reading Jean-François Millet's painting works and Vincent Van Gogh's reproductions on the same subject recently, I suddenly noticed that we are all lived by somethings, supposed.

Jean-François Millet (1814 to 1865) 's painting works had showed how heroic are The Working Class in society. In Evening Prayer a farmer coupe is praying for the gives by god after hard working. This painting bring a point: The farmer lived because the farm gives.

Picture

Jean-François Millet, The Gleaners, 1857, Musée d'Orsay, Paris.

The Gleaners (1857) showed depicting women stooping in the fields to pick up the leftovers from the harvest, delivered the powerful and timeless statement about The Working Class. Picking up what was left after harvest was regarded as one of the lowest jobs in society. However, people at the higher level in society seems did not aware where their basic food comes from. 

Van Gogh had also reproduced many painting works of Millet during his stay at Saint Remy de Provence. He did so because he totally appreciate Millet's acts in displaying The Working Class.

Picture

Woodcutter (after Millet)

Picture

The Reaper (after Millet)

Picture

Thresher (after Millet)

Picture

Sheaf-Binder (after Millet)

Picture

Sheep-Shearers (after Millet)

Picture

Reaper with Sickle (after Millet)

Picture

Peasant Woman Cutting Straw (after Millet)

Picture

Peasant Woman with a Rake (after Millet)

Picture

Peasant Woman Binding Sheaves (after Millet)

Picture

Morning - Peasant Couple Going to Work (after Millet)

Picture

Noon - Rest from Work (after Millet)

Picture

Evening - The End of the Day (after Millet)

Have we noticed that beside our own hard work, we all are lived by some other things (perhaps farmer, worker, the system of current society, the Earth, ...).


[5] Re:
edithtse :
想起Evangelian劇場版大結局入面的一幕: 忘了是誰(Jennifer,你記唔記得?)用一張白紙和一支鉛筆令碇真治明白'這一小片土地也要接連著更大的土地才能存在'的道理.

唔...其實我不exactly記得了,但大意是「這世界是不能得你一人才成為世界」...但肯定原文配以畫面係正好多啦~~
梁輝先生你有冇睇過《新世紀福音戰士》?


[引用] | 作者 Jennifer | 11th May 2007 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[4]

The Potato Eaters, Van Gogh, 1885.

The Working Class's reward: eating pain potato and drinking black tea after a day of hard working.

In fact, 一小片土地 can sustain without 連著更大的土地, is it interesting ? 


[引用] | 作者 chaser | 11th May 2007 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[3]

想起Evangelian劇場版大結局入面的一幕: 忘了是誰(Jennifer,你記唔記得?)用一張白紙和一支鉛筆令碇真治明白'這一小片土地也要接連著更大的土地才能存在'的道理.


[引用] | 作者 edithtse | 11th May 2007 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[2]

I totally agree. I like the statement: 一小片土地也要接連著更大的土地才能存在.


[引用] | 作者 Chaser | 9th May 2007 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[1]

我記得很久以前看過荀子的論說(當然是有白話文注解啦),原文已忘了,但大意是「無論我們多清高、脫俗,但總也不能絕對遺世獨立而生存,因為就算你說你只佔所站立的一小片地,毋須其他人的存在,但這一小片土地也要接連著更大的土地才能存在。」即我們的客觀存在是不能不倚仗外物(農夫、工人、社會制度、地球天然資源...)。
覺得好像有點能回應你所想的。


[引用] | 作者 黎華嫂 | 8th May 2007 | [舉報垃圾留言]